boookish

Genre: Contemporary fiction
Setting: Brooklyn, New York City
Narrator: Third person, focusing mostly on Vaclav and Lena

First line(s): “’Here, I practice, and you practice. Ahem. AH-em. I am Vaclav the Magnificent, with birthday on the sixth of May, the famous day for the generations to celebrate and rejoice, a day in the future years eclipsing Christmas and Hanukkah and Ramadan and all pagan festivals, born in a land far, far, far, far, far, far, far distance from here, a land of ancient and magnificent secrets, a land of enchanted knowledge passed down from the ages and from the ancients, a land of illusion (Russia!), born there in Russia and reappearing here, in America, in New York, in Brooklyn (which is a Borough), near Coney Island, which is a famous place of magic in the great land of opportunity (which is, of course, America), where anyone can become anything, where a hobo today is tomorrow a businessman in a three-pieces-suit, and a businessman yesterday is later this afternoon a hobo, Vaclav the Magnificent, who shall, without no doubt, be ask to perform his might feats of enchantment for dukes and presidents and czars and ayatollahs, uniting them all in awestruck and dumbstrucks, and thus, one day in the future years, be heralding a new era (which is a piece of time) of peace on earth.”

Quick summary: Two nine-year-old Russian immigrants, Vaclav and Lena, become best friends despite their very different circumstances. Vaclav, who dreams of one day becoming a famous magician with Lena by his side, lives with his parents, who came to America so that Vaclav could have a better life. Lena, however, is a skinny, neglected orphan living with her stripper aunt. One day, Lena disappears from Vaclav’s life, but she is never far from this thoughts. Where did she go, and will they be reunited?

How did I feel about the character(s)? These are two kids whose pasts and presents are so well-drawn that you can’t help but feel for them. Maybe it’s not exactly the most plausible thing for these two to have been in love since they were children, but it works within the context of the story.

What did I like most about the book? There are just some flat-out wonderful passages, such as:

“Of course they were with each other the whole time. Even when they weren’t looking, they never had to check. She was always there; he was always there. Outside her bedroom, somewhere in the darkness, like the moon.”

“He is refusing to believe. He is refusing to understand. He is the silence before a bomb explodes. He is the tick, tick tick, tick before the boom.”

Other thoughts? I’ve read other reviews that said the author’s depiction of Russian immigrants isn’t exactly accurate, but I can’t really speak to that. Sure, there are a lot of stereotypes (i.e. the borscht-eating and vodka-swilling father), but the crux of the story is the relationship between the two kids, which I thought was well-developed and sincere.

Also, I heard that the author wrote this while her husband was dying of cancer and that he didn’t live to see it released. Heartbreaking stuff.

Why did I read it? I saw the book on the front table at the local book store, and the cover caught my attention. I thought the overall premise sounded sweet, and thought the disappearance aspect was interesting.

Who do I recommend it to? People who like books focused on precocious kids, maybe like The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime. The very quotable writing also kind of reminds me of Nicole Krauss’s The History of Love.

Will I read the author’s other works? Maybe not solely based on this novel, but if the plot of her future works sound intriguing, I’ll give them a shot.

Do I like the cover? Like I said before, the cover is what initially drew me to the book. In the book, Vaclav makes a magician’s hat out of paper, and I think the cover kind of alludes to those paper craft projects we do as children.

How long did it take to finish? Seven days, but it is a much quicker read than my slow progress would indicate.

Rating: 3.5 stars
Finished: February 26, 2012
Total Pages: 292
Kindle Locations: 4,255
Date Published: May 17, 2011
Publisher: The Dial Press
Buy It: Print or Kindle

Total Books Read in 2012: 4

Genre: Historical fiction
Setting: New York City, 1938
Narrator: Katey Kontent, a 25-year-old Wall Street secretary

First line: “On the night of October 4th, 1966, Val and I, both late middle age, attended the opening of Many Are Called at the Museum of Modern Art—the first exhibit of the portaits taken by Walker Evans in the late 1930s on the New York City subways with a hidden camera.” 

Quick summary: After meeting a young successful banker named Theodore “Tinker” Grey on New Year’s Eve, Katey Kontent, together with her roommate and best friend Eve Ross, is introduced to the upper reaches of New York society. In a year that changes everything for the people involved, Katey discovers what wealth and station can bring, but also at what cost. 

How did I feel about the character(s)? Katey is awesome. She’s smart, witty, confident, and an all-around great narrator.

What did I like most about the book? As I was reading this and telling other people about it, I just kept saying, “It’s so fancy!” I loved that. I loved seeing the world of the rich and successful through the eyes of someone more relatable. (It doesn’t hurt that we have the same first name, either). The parties, the clothes, the cars…it was just how I’d pictured that era, at least for those who made it through the Depression unscathed.

Other thoughts? They eat a LOT of canapés (but what would you expect). No, but seriously, the writing is wonderful. Take, for example, “In our twenties, when there is still so much time ahead of us, time that seems ample for a hundred indecisions, for a hundred visions and revisions—we draw a card, and we must decide right then and there whether to keep that card and discard the next, or discard the first card and keep the second. And before we know it, the deck has been played out and the decisions we have just made will shape our lives for decades to come.”

Why did I read it? I had been watching (so, so much) Downton Abbey, and I wanted to read something where the kind of lifestyle was similar. I know the two are set two decades apart, but both offer a glimpse into the world of privilege and opportunity.

Who do I recommend it to? Other people who watch Downton for the reasons above. Maybe also to fans of The Great Gatsby. It’s really just a great book, though, so I highly recommend it in general.

Will I read the author’s other works? It doesn’t look like he’s released anything else, but his future works will very likely make their way to my to-read list.

Do I like the cover? For sure. “It’s so fancy!”

How long did it take to finish? Six days.

Rating: 5 stars
Finished: January 29, 2012
Total Pages: 352
Kindle Locations: 5,174
Date Published: July 26, 2011
Publisher: Viking Adult
Buy It: Print or Kindle

Total Books Read in 2012: 3

Genre: Classic, Gothic, Mystery
Setting: Victorian England
Narrator: Varies, but mainly first-person accounts from Walter Hartright and Marian Halcombe

First line: “This is the story of what a Woman’s patience can endure, and of what a Man’s resolution can achieve.”

Quick summary: Walter, a drawing-master from London, finds himself employed at Limmeridge House in the country, where he is to teach his skills to the two young women who live there. Before he departs, however, he has a chance encounter with a woman in white, who has just escaped from an asylum. During their conversation, he mentions the place he is traveling to, and finds that she is familiar with it and the people there.

Did anything surprise me? I’ve heard that this was the first sensational novel, so I suspect many of the plot twists were surprising to readers during the 19th century, but those of us reading today are more accustomed to literary devices, such as foreshadowing. That isn’t to say that I saw where the book was going from the beginning, because I definitely didn’t, but there was only one moment when I was really and truly shocked.

Other thoughts? I don’t know if it’s because my reading time was spread out over so many short sessions or because it really is lengthy, but this book seemed so long. As I was reading it, I just wanted the 

Who do I recommend it to? Fans of Gothic or crime literature, as well as people who read and enjoyed Michael Cox’s The Meaning of Night and The Glass of Time.

Why did I read it? This was one of the books I chose for the Back to the Classics reading challenger, for the 19th century category. I’d had it on my shelf for so long, and figured it was time! Plus, I really loved Michael Cox’s books, which several people have said were influenced by Wilkie Collins. I definitely see some of the similarities, as well.

Will I read the author’s other works? I’ve heard good things about The Moonstone, so I will probably read that at some point, but possibly not for a long while.

Do I like the cover? I love the cover of the Penguin hardcover classics edition, designed by Coralie Bickford-Smith, which a friend gave it to me for Christmas one year. I read the Kindle edition, though, which has a plain, boring cover.

How long did it take to finish? Three weeks, and only because I started taking the bus to work, so now I have that extra reading time. Too many 12-hour work days meant I barely had any other opportunities!

Rating: 3.5 stars
Finished: January 22, 2012
Total Pages: 627 (Penguin Hardcover Classics edition)
Kindle Locations: 11,421
Date Published: 1859
Publisher: Public domain
Buy It: Print or Kindle

Total Books Read in 2012: 2

Genre: Contemporary fiction
Setting: Present day, Brazil’s Amazon rainforest
Narrator: 3rd person, focusing on Dr. Marina Singh

First line: “The news of Anders Eckman’s death came by way of Aerogram, a piece of bright blue airmail paper that served as both the stationary and, when folded over and sealed along the edges, the envelope.”

Quick summary: After receiving the news of her co-worker’s death, Dr. Marina Singh is sent to Brazil retrace his footsteps and finish the job he was meant to do: find her former teacher, Dr. Annick Swenson, who is developing a fertility drug in the Amazon, and convince her to move her work back to the U.S.

How did I feel about the character(s)? Marina is clearly a smart and well-respected doctor, but she didn’t always come across that way. Obviously a lot of that is because she was dropped into an environment completely different from her native Minnesota, but the questions she asked of Dr. Swenson and the others she met made her seem naive. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, since the reader is new to most of the details, as well, but her personality seemed to changed a lot as soon as she set foot in Brazil.

What did I like most about the book? I loved Easter. He’s a smart, brave kid who quickly charmed everyone, including the impervious Dr. Swenson. He learned to overcome his disability (deafness) in such a way that it essentially became a non-issue, and he is relied upon heavily by Marina and several others. It was easy to see why they care for him so much.

Did anything surprise me? I didn’t see the ending coming at all, but I won’t spoil that for anyone.

Other thoughts? This isn’t a fluffy book, and the pace isn’t exactly fast, but it was enjoyable, nonetheless. The descriptions of the Amazon, while somewhat repetitive, successfully created a picture of the untamed setting and its native inhabitants. Although the book was largely character-driven, it also addresses several ethical questions. The fertility drug Dr. Swenson is working on would increase the age at which women could conceive, eliminating the “biological clock.” But is it right to put the body through that at those later stages in life? What becomes of the children born to women who conceive at 60, or even 70?

Who do I recommend it to? People who have read Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, or who like books with determined female characters.

Why did I read it? I didn’t read very many books written 2011, and wanted to try to fit this one in at the very end of the year. I had seen it’s placement on several top ten lists, and thought it sounded like an interesting loose take on Heart of Darkness, which I read nine years ago for a class in high school.

Will I read the author’s other works? I had previously been interested in reading Bel Canto, and I would say I’m more likely to read it now, though I’ve heard mixed reviews about it.

Do I like the cover? The cover is probably one of the reasons I didn’t read the book sooner, because it came across as a typical, serious novel written by a woman.

How long did it take to finish? Six days, although I read more than half of it in one day.

Rating: 4 stars
Finished: January 1, 2012
Total Pages: 353
Kindle Locations: 6,555
Date Published: May 15, 2011
Publisher: HarperCollins
Buy It: Print or Kindle

Total Books Read in 2012: 1

Happy New Year!

I was a terrible reader in 2011. Though I read more books than I did in 2009, I also read 19 fewer than in 2010. Perhaps I over-reached with the goal of reading 52 books and got discouraged early on when I fell off pace. This year, my goal will be 40 books, which would double the amount I read in 2011, but still be more than I’ve ever finished in a single year.

Some books I’m hoping to make time for include: 

• Broken Harbour by Tana French (2012)
• The Starboard Sea by Amber Dermont (2012)
• State of Wonder by Ann Patchett (2011)
• 1Q84 by Haruki Murakami (2011)
• Faith by Jennifer Haigh (2011)
• When She Woke by Hillary Jordan (2011)
• In the Garden of Beasts by Erik Larson (2011)
• On Canaan’s Side by Sebastian Barry (2011)
• Rules of Civility by Amor Towles (2011)
• City of Ash by Megan Chance (2011)
• The Passage by Justin Cronin (2010)
• The Gone Away World by Nick Harkaway (2008)
• Cold Mountain by Charles Frazier (1997)
• The Alienist by Caleb Carr (1994)

Also, I read exactly zero classics in 2011 so that I could fit in a few new releases. To make sure that doesn’t happen in 2012, I’m going to do the Back to the Classics Challenge hosted by Sarah Reads Too Much. Here are my (tentative) picks for the categories:

Any 19th century classic: The Woman in White by Wilkie Collins (1859)
Any 20th century classic: East of Eden by John Steinbeck (1952)
Reread a classic of your choice: Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury (1953)
Classic play: The Crucible by Arthur Miller (1953)
Classic mystery/horror/crime fiction: Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier (1938)
Classic romance: Persuasion by Jane Austen (1817)
Classic translated to English: Night by Elie Wiesel (1960)
Classic award winner: The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton (Pulitzer, 1921)
Classic set in a country that you will not visit during your lifetime: The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien (Middle Earth, 1937)

I’m excited about these goals, and hope 2012 is a great year for reading!

Most favorite read: The Living by Annie Dillard
A sprawling book that spans generations, it took me a while to finish, but it was well-worth the time and effort. The prose is gorgeous, and I loved its depictions of Washington in the 1800s. I love my state, and this book is a wonderful homage to its early beginnings.

Least favorite read: The Night Circus by Erin Morgenstern
Just don’t even get me started on this one. I understand that it has more than 12,000 positive ratings on Goodreads, but I just don’t get it.

Book that I just couldn’t finish: West of Here by Jonathan Evison
I really wanted to love this book. A historical novel set in Washington would normally be right up my alley, but I couldn’t get through the drivel. The dialogue didn’t seem authentic, the prose is pretentious, and I’m really confused why the author thought he had to make up a city when he’s basically just writing about Port Angeles.

Most surprising find in 2011: The Fates Will Find Their Way by Hannah Pittard
I heard about this book randomly, and picked it up on the pretense that it would be similar to Jeffrey Eugenides’ The Virgin Suicides, which I loved. While they share some aspects, it’s definitely it’s own book, and one I was surprised to enjoy as much as I did.

Most anticipated book of 2011: The Pale King by David Foster Wallace
I was very excited to read DFW’s final work, but the timing just wasn’t right. One of the main characters works for the IRS and is studying for the CPA exam. When the book was released, I was in the middle of taking an accounting class, and the exam questions interspersed hit too close to home. I had to set it aside, but I’m sure I’ll get to it.

Most memorable character: Gurion Maccabee from The Instructions by Adam Levin
I mean, this is 1,000 pages in first-person about kid who thinks he’s the messiah. He’d be memorable even if he wasn’t eloquent and brilliant.

Favorite author discovery: Teddy Wayne
I heard the praise for Kapitoil last year, but wasn’t persuaded to read it until the Kindle version went on sale for 99 cents during the summer. I sure was missing out! His writing is smart, funny, and enjoyable. I flew through the book, and I can’t wait to read what he releases next.

Favorite cover of a book read in 2011: Stories for Nighttime and Some for the Day by Ben Loory
It’s not super simple, but it’s balanced, and I love the quirky imagery. It’s also a good representation of the short stories inside.

Longest: The Instructions by Adam Levin, 1,030 pages
Shortest: Running a Thousand Miles to Freedom by William and Ellen Craft, 52 pages
Fastest: Kapitoil by Teddy Wayne
Slowest: The Night Circus by Erin Morgenstern
Funniest: Kapitoil by Teddy Wayne
Saddest: The Kitchen House by Kathleen Grissom
Scariest: Zone One by Colson Whitehead
Best Prose: The Living by Annie Dillard

I will be the first to admit that I sucked at reading this year. I finished just 20 books (as compared to 39 in 2010), and only eight of those were released in 2011. So, instead of doing a top ten list like everyone else, I’m going to do a top five list. Of course, I didn’t read many of the books fellow bloggers are championing, so I’m also going to include the top five books I haven’t gotten around to yet.

Top Five Books I Read:

1. The Art of Fielding by Chad Harbach (review)
2. The Fates Will Find Their Way by Hannah Pittard (review)
3. Zone One by Colson Whitehead (review)
4. Ready Player One by Ernest Cline (review)
5. We the Animals by Justin Torres (review)

Top Five Books Still To Be Read:

1. State of Wonder by Ann Patchett (currently reading)
2. 1Q84 by Haruki Murakami
3. Faith by Jennifer Haigh
4. When She Woke by Hillary Jordan
5. In the Garden of Beasts by Erik Larson

Genre: Contemporary fiction, Jewish
Setting: Chicago, Illinois. November 14 to 17, 2006
Narrator: Gurion ben-Judah Maccabee, a 10-year-old student at Aptakisic Junior High, who may or may not be the messiah.

First line(s): “There is damage. There was always damage and there will be more damage, but not always.”

Quick summary: Gurion is a brilliant and devout Israelite who has been kicked out of three Jewish schools, and is now in the Cage, a program for disruptive and violent students at his new secular school. Over the course of four days, he falls in love with a girl named Eliza June Watermark, wrestles with his destiny, and attempts to overthrow “the Arrangement” (the teachers and jocks), with the help of his friends in the Cage and his army of Torah scholars.

How did I feel about the character(s)? Gurion is a piece of work, that’s for sure. Spouting off dialogue that makes him seem closer to 30 than 10, he has a lot of expectations heaped onto him. His fellow scholars call him Rabbi, his friends in the Cage look to him as their leader, and he himself suspects (and hopes) he is the messiah. Gurion is tough and more than willing to fight for what he thinks is right, but he can also be uncertain and will analyze the actions of himself and others to an often excruciating degree. I wouldn’t say I agree with many of his actions, but he is definitely a good talker and explains himself well.

Did anything surprise me? Not to ruin anything, but there was a moment 160 pages from the end where I might have audibly gasped while reading on the bus. Let’s just say it was near the start of the Gurionic War and it had to do with Boystar. Yikes. Really, though, I was very surprised by the seriousness of Gurion’s opinion of himself. I really didn’t expect that level of follow-through.

Other thoughts? I think the book’s length has less to say about the author than it does about Gurion. This is his story, and he’s going to tell it how he wants. The book covers only four days, but is a THOUSAND pages long. To say that he dissects every day to its smallest detail is an understatement. Some of that slows down the pace a bit, but the engaging dialogue between the pre-teens makes up for it. He calls the book his scripture, but it really acts more as his defense, and he needs every bit of it.

Who do I recommend it to? This is probably obvious, but anyone who likes the work of Jonathan Safran Foer, particularly Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, would be remiss to pass this by. Gurion’s serious precociousness reminded me a lot of Oskar, and both characters are Jewish.

Why did I read it? I’m all for books about wiser-than-their-years kids. One about a boy who legitimately thinks he is the messiah kicked the interest up a notch. I also liked the idea that part of the story is told through letters, e-mails, and transcripts.

Do I like the cover? Definitely. The book was originally released in five different hardcovers, and I received the white one. The design is simple, but made elegant with plain type and gold foil. It still catches my eye when I see it on a shelf.

How long did it take to finish? 11 months and 20 days, but that’s seriously skewed. I bought the hardcover version in January and read it fairly consistently until March, but the size just got annoying. Then, in November, I discovered that it had been released for Kindle, so I was finally able to finish it!

Rating: 4 stars
Finished: December 27, 2011
Total Pages: 1,030
Kindle Locations: 19,888
Date Published: November 1, 2010
Publisher: McSweeney’s
Buy It: Print or Kindle

It’s no secret that I love reading, but I don’t exactly love trying to form complete sentences with coherent thoughts after I finish each book. Such is the reason that I posted a review today for a book that I read two MONTHS ago. I thought that creating this blog would be a good way to practice my writing, since I don’t get to exercise much creativity at work (aside from using color in Excel spreadsheets), but the reality has been much different. Instead, the burden of trying to articulate what I liked or didn’t like about a book has pushed this blog to the bottom of my priority list. Why did I think I’d be able to sit down for an hour (or six) to write a couple paragraphs that don’t even get my full opinion across? I love lists and statistics, brevity and bullet-points. So, it’s time to change things up a bit.

Instead of following my usual, formal format for reviews, I’ve decided to come up with a list of some general questions that I’ll answer about each book, likely including:

• What is the genre?
• What is the setting?
• Who is the narrator?
• How did I feel about the characters(s)?
• What did I think of the cover?
• Why did I chose to read this book?
• Have I read, or will I read, more books by the author?

Are there any other questions you think I should address in each review? I will try to write a few sentences in addition to answering these questions, but I think this will help to take off some of the self-imposed pressure.

The first book I’ll review following this format will be Adam Levin’s The Instructions, which I finally (FINALLY!) finished yesterday after reading it for nearly a year.

This is a super (SUPER) belated review, but I actually wrote most of it right after I finished the book back in October. But work got busy at the beginning of November, and since then, I’ve just been…lazy. (The internet and my phone are huge distractions.) But here it is, finally:

I know that zombies are pretty prevalent in American culture at the moment, but I’m kind of a newbie to this sub-horror genre. I’ve seen exactly one zombie movie (Zombieland), two episodes of The Walking Dead, and, now, I’ve read one zombie book.

A plague has created “skels” (zombies) across the planet, effectively wiping out most of humanity. The federal government has relocated from Washington D.C. to Buffalo, New York, and is currently clearing an area of Manhattan to be repopulated by the survivors. Unfolding over three days, the novel follows a civilian sweeper, Mark Spitz (which isn’t his real name, but a nickname he earned during an event that is eventually described), as he and the Omega unit search for skels and stragglers, building by building and floor by floor, within the zone. As they work their way through the zone, Mark Spitz recalls the events that led up to the present day: the arrival of the plague, how he survived, and his relationship with another survivor.

Though the book is in third person, the writing was very stream-of-consciousness. The narrative jumps from present day to a memory without warning, and often this was a little hard to follow. I understand that it was structured this way to illustrate the Mark Spitz’s PASD (Post-Apocalyptic Stress Disorder), and that non-linear form is probably what contributes to its reputation as a literary novel, as opposed to a genre novel, but it was still confusing. I’m willing to forgive that, though, as the writing was captivating and quite highlight-able:

“He was a mediocre man. He had led a mediocre life exceptional only in the magnitude of its unexceptionality. Now the world was mediocre, rendering him perfect.”

“Best to let the broken glass be broken glass, let it splinter into smaller pieces and dust and scatter. Let the cracks between things widen until they are no longer cracks but the new places for things. That was where they were now. The world wasn’t ending: it had ended and now they were in the new place. They could not recognize it because they had never seen it before.”

Rating: 4 stars
Finished: October 24, 2011
Total Pages: 259
Kindle Locations: 4,077
Date Published: October 18, 2011
Publisher: Knopf Doubleday
Buy It: Print or Kindle